Archive for the ‘Vegan Talk’ Category

A Vegetarian’s Introduction to China

Monday, April 27th, 2009

Here is another repost of mine from Lost Lao Wai. You can find the original post, with some VERY interesting discussions in the comments here.

************************************************************

Since I moved to China eight months or so ago, I’ve came across a large amount of challenges. They have ranged from communication breakdowns, to awkward stares, to being witness to things that you just can’t unsmell. However, the question that I have been asked the most by my friends and family back home have centred around one clear topic, food.

I have spent much of the last five years as a practicing vegan. While this decision is one that I certainly consider to be a great one, it has certainly not made dining easy, especially in China, where meat is less an option and more a way of life. Worry not though, fellow herbivores, maintaining your lifestyle choices can be possible in the Middle Kingdom.

Eating an animal free diet in China is indeed a challenge, but one that is certainly possible to overcome. But before you step right in, you need to be clear of meat’s place in China, both on the tables and in the minds of the people.

Meat is considered by many Chinese to be a status symbol, as it is generally more expensive than fruits and vegetables. As a result, the wealthy people tend to eat the most meat. This is a huge reason as to why the global consumption of meat has increased so rapidly in recent years. The Chinese are getting richer, and therefore consuming far more meat. This means that a wealthy foreigner should obviously eat lots of meat, since we clearly have lots of money.

Clearly, this in itself gives you quite the uphill battle. I had many occasions were I would communicate that I do not eat meat and it would be followed up with some very quizzical looks from the locals. It’s not that I felt judged or harassed for my beliefs, I was just alien to them.

That being said, it still doesn’t hurt to try to tell people that you are a vegetarian. If you can say the following phrase (or show the following characters) to a waiter, you could be off to a good start. “Wǒ shì sùshízhǔyìzhě” (我是素食主义者), this translates pretty directly to “I am a vegetarian”, which is of course a very useful thing to say. However, to be honest, I find it to be quite a mouthful to say, and don’t feel that I can do it properly with all of the “sh” and “zh” sounds being thrown around. So if your Mandarin sounds as garbled as mine, try the much easier “wǒ bù chī ròu” (我不吃肉), which is saying “I eat no meat”.

Also, in many traditional Chinese dishes, meat is used less for substance, and more for seasoning. There are many great dishes in China that use just a little bit of meat to add flavour to the food (I would assume because the original cooks were too poor to use all of the animal), so be prepared for many dishes to contain some sort of meat in them.

Menus at Chinese restaurants can often involve some interesting, and unintentionally misleading translations, which can lead you to get tofu full of beef chunks, or a plate of broccoli given to you covered in ham. This can be avoided by a simple bit of character recognition. The character means “meat”, and it appears on most menu items that would contain any meat, as the direct translation of beef and pork are “cow meat” and “pig meat” respectively. So if you think that you see something like “Grandmothers fragrant garden roots”, check to find that character, because those garden roots may end up smelling like pig intestines. I find that character easy to remember, as it looks like a few cows in a pen unaware of their fate, or two wishbones sitting on a table waiting to be cracked.

If you still aren’t certain, sometimes it can be helpful to point at something on the menu and ask “zhè ge yǒu méiyǒu ròu” (这个有没有肉) which is “Does this have meat?” and hope that they say “méiyǒu (没有)” indicating that there is no meat and you can stop stressing about the ordering and get back to enjoying your meal.

Of course the most important thing to remember, is to relax. There will more than likely be times were you are brought something with eyes or a beak on it despite your best efforts. My best advice in those situations is to just give the food to your friends (Chinese meals are meant to be family style anyway), and enjoy your rice or whatever else you may have. Then get ready to try again for the next meal, which of course may be soon given that you only had rice for dinner.

China can be a very frustrating place for a lao wai, but if you try to skip the food and stay with the Western establishments then you are missing out on an interesting and important part of Chinese society. So, Veggies out there, please do yourself a favour and try to brave some Chinese restaurants. After all, with the rate things are going here, all the Western restaurants will just be KFC soon enough anyway, then what are you going to eat?

Safe journeys,

G

Blog Action Day 08 Post – Distribution of Resources and Your Diet (It Ain’t Easy Being Green – Take 4)

Wednesday, October 15th, 2008


That’s right, looking at that banner you will notice that today is indeed Blog Action Day, with the theme being poverty. Bloggers all over the world have been encouraged to make a post today with the eradication of poverty. Since I sort of lack a central theme to this blog I had all sorts of options, ranging from my trip to Laos last year, a political rant, or research into the work done by some of my favourite athletes or politicians. However, at the end of the day, I decided that the best one for me would be to revisit a feature that I have not examined in a very long time here, “It Ain’t Easy Being Green”, the Kermit the Frog inspired posts as to why I am a vegan. And today, I will look at just how far veganism goes to lessening poverty around the world.

Before I go into this, I would like to establish that this case is based on a simple (but logical) assumption: One of the major root causes of poverty is an inequity of resources. To simplify, the poorest people in the world are the ones who have the least. If the world’s ample resources where more evenly distributed, then less people would be living in poverty.

Here lies the connection that exists between veganism and reducing poverty. The livestock industry is a clear example of the unequitable distribution of resources taking place in our world, furthering the gap between rich and poor.

Before I get too into this, let me state three simple facts:

1. Animals (especially cows) eat a lot. There are several facts out there as to just how much, but the fact remains that animals need to eat food. There are reports as high as 20 lbs of grain needed to produce 1 point of beef, and as low as 2 pounds of grain to produce 1 pound of beef. With pigs being lower, and chickens lower still. In reality, it is probably on the lower side (since cows are not fed grains from birth). No matter how you calculate it, it is a cold hard fact that you need to put more food into an animal than you can get out of it.

2. Animals (again especially cows) need to drink a lot of water. Not only do they need to drink the water, but the crops harvested for them (see above) need to have water to grow. Several studies have been done on this, and the average findings show that it takes approximetly 16,726 litres to produce one pound of beef and 5,469 for pork or 3,609 for poultry. Compare this with 2,552 for rice and 2,517 for soybeans.

3. There are a finite amount of resources on this earth. Simple right? There are only 148,940,000 km² of land for all 6.5 billion people on earth to share with one another. That is only 0.023km² each, and that’s not a heck of a lot. Of course, in reality it is far less than that, since much of that land is inhospitable, and a large amount needs to be left for plants and other animals.

So how do these three simple facts connect veganism with the eradication of poverty?

The answer is really quite logical. See, since there is only so much space on the earth we need to be using it as efficently as possible for everyone right? Now while this sounds all well and good in theory, the reality is that we really, really, are not doing this. The fact is that we are using some of the most arable land in the world, and planting food to feed our food, as opposed to using this land to feed our people.

(Tangent: The land use for any Organic/Free Range/Grain Fed meat product would be far more, since the animals are not as tightly packed-in together (in theory). Thus negating one of the main counter-points to the animal rights arguments for veganism)

Also, we are using far too much water to produce meat. According to the above statistics, we could produce five times the amount of soybeans as beef with the same amount of water. The inneficency is truly terrifying.

To further emphasise the point, world food prices have been rising drastically in recent years, further compounding the problems that the poorest people in the world are facing. While much of the blame has been palced on ethanol, that is oversimplifying a complex problem. Since 1980, China’s average meat consumption has increased 30kg/person/year since 1980, and when you consider that there are 1.3 billion people in that country, that is a lot of people.

This obviously means less grain to feed people, and less land for crops to plant for human consumption. Coupled this with an increase in human population, and anyone with even a basic knowledge of economics can see that when you increase demand and lower supply the prices are going to go way up. While this means that Westerners have to tighten up their belts a bit, it means the difference between life and death to the worlds poorest people.

An estimated 800 million people are chronically hungry in our world. And the glutinous Western World is using the land and resources to fatten up animals for its own taste buds while so many people are dying. If we were able to even reduce the amount of meat that we eat, then we would be able to give (or sell) far more food to the truly needy in the world.

Even a reduction of meat consumption could make a huge difference for the people who need it the most. Please think about that the next time you sit down for dinner.

Until next time,

G

Take 1 – Pacifism
Take 2 – The Environment
Take 3 – Pesticides, and Poo, and Pus, Oh My!
Take 4 – Distribution of Resources

It Ain’t Easy Being Green – Take 3 – Pesticidies, and Poo, and Pus, Oh My!

Saturday, February 23rd, 2008

Well it certainly has been a while since I posted, and even longer while since I made any vegan related postings. Truth is, I want my pro-vegan posts to be well done so I tend to devote large amounts of time to writing them, and well large amounts of time are sometimes at a premium, what with life and what have you. Anyway, enough excuses and preamble it’s time to get to the meat…errr tofu, of the post here.

I have already scratched the surface about the ethical, and environmental reasons being a cruelty-free lifestyle, but today I am going to talk about a far more disgusting, but more selfish reason that I have for being a vegan. The simple fact that meat, eggs, and dairy are a regular shmorgazborg of toxicity.

In my title, I outline three of the major contaminants to animal products, I will break them down one at a time. Keep in mind that I am just focusing on the three Ps, but there are a lot more contaminants out there, ranging from mercury to hormones, but I think that those will wait for a later post.

Pesticides

I know what your first reaction is. “They only put pesticides on plants, so vegetarians should have to worry about these more than an omni”. Well that is both right, and very wrong.

For starters, they do indeed put pesticides on vegetables, but one needs to remember that cows, pigs, and chickens all eat vegetables. Also, since food fed to livestock undergoes far less screening than food fed to humans, the pesticide level in what your cow eats can be really quite high. Now I know that you’re probably wondering what Bessie’s diet has to do with you, but in actual fact, it has a direct result.

You see, there is this funny scientific term called “Biomagnification“, and well the gist of it is that the concentration of toxins amplify as you raise the trophic levels, or in English, pesticides (and other pollutants such as arsenic) that get eaten by a cow, stay in the cows system, and then get worse when that cow gets eaten by something else (i.e. you).

In Diet for a New America, author John Robbins mentions that the breast milk of meat-eating mothers had 35 times the amount of pesticides as that of vegetarian mothers. Yes, you read that right, 35 times the amount of pesticides in the breast milk from eating meat. So not only are you harming yourself, you could be harming your children. Keep in mind, that infants and children are far more susceptible to the adverse affects of toxins, since their internal organs are not fully developed.

So while the saying “You are what you eat” has its merits, perhaps we should be saying “You are what your food eats.”

Poo

Animal products such as red meat, poultry, eggs, seafood, and dairy products are the foods most likely to cause human illness.Further, because feces are the vehicle for transmission of pathogens to humans who consume animal flesh, the true cause of foodborne illness related to the consumption of meat or poultry is the presence of feces infected with pathogenic bacteria on that meat or poultry. ” – Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine (PCRM) petition to the USDA, August 29, 2001.

Read the last sentence of that quote as many times as you need to in order for it to sink in. I don’t know about you but “the presence of feces infected with pathogenic bacteria on that meat or poultry”, really doesn’t make me want to rush out to buy a burger.

The same survey above also states Current regulations allow fecally contaminated poultry and meat to be passed at inspection, as long as the feces are not “visible” to the naked eye. ”

So really, your chicken could be dropped into a bunch of feces, whipped off, and then away it goes, direct to your stomach…appetizing, eh?

Pus

Click for Embedded Video

With the mass production of dairy, far beyond what their bodies were designed for, many cows produce blisters and boils, which inevitably burst. Now when these things burst, they produce a great deal of puss, which has to go somewhere, right? Well it goes right into the thick, white fluid that looks just like pus, which cows make tonnes of every day for human consumption.

The dairy industry classifies milk as “abnormal” and states that it should not enter the food supply, if it has a pus count of more than 200, 000 cells per litre. Now, I don’t know much about puss, but 200, 000 cells still seems like a lot of pus to fill up a litre, I for one don’t want to drink any pus.

To make it even more disgusting, in the United States, Hawaii is the only state that can meet this standard, with the majority of states passing 300, 000. The worst offender, was Florida which had an average count around 548, 000. I’d like to point out, that this is an average count, meaning that about half of the milk in Florida would have MORE than 548, 000 cells per litre.

Love them, or hate them (which I vary between on almost a daily basis), PETA conducted a “Got Pus? Milk Sure Does” campaign to try and raise awareness on this issue. Now, as you would understand, the Dairy Council would be pretty upset about it, and have threatened PETA with legal action on the issue. Are they charging them with libel for spreading false information? Oh no, they are charging them with copyright infringement, since it is too close to the “Got Milk?” campaign.

Now, parodies are protected under US Law, so really they don’t have a leg to stand on, but it raises an interesting point. I find it curious that PETA is not getting charged for spreading false information. This tells me that the powers that be in the Milk World know that PETA is right, and they can’t prove in a court of law that their products are pus free. Obviously if they could prove this, they would go for it and get a very large libel suit out of PETA and anyone else who makes such claims.

Now I know that a lot of you out there looking for pesticide, poo, and pus free alternatives out there, are probably thinking about organic food. Well, the USDA is looking to expand their already weak regulations on what counts as “organic” to include more toxins. Sure that leaves out their rules on poo and pus, but I really can’t help but wonder how long it will take them to lax out on those rules too.

So if you really want to have a diet that doesn’t have those three Ps, I can recommend one for you, it’s a little tough at first, but remember, it ain’t easy being green…

Until next time,

G

Take 1 – Pacifism
Take 2 – The Environment
Take 3 – Pesticides, and Poo, and Pus, Oh My!
Take 4 – Distribution of Resources

Personal Milestone

Monday, October 1st, 2007

October 1st marks an important day on the Glen-Calender (..Glalender?). On this day, 4 years ago I made a really important and influential decision.
That’s right, on this day back in 2003 I decided to become a vegetarian. I officially gave myself one calender year to switch to a full-scale vegan, setting myself dates and targets (i.e. After this day, I will no longer eat _______).

When I first made this decision I got a lot of flak, including McNutt’s infamous “Go back to your room and think about what you’ve done” rant at me when I first told him and my father asking “what’s her name?”, thinking that I was doing it for a girl. Many, many, people said that I wouldn’t last a month and well here I am four years later.

In looking back I think that this is one of the best decisions I have ever made, I feel so much healthier, I am in better shape, and more importantly, I feel like a stronger person as a result of that day back in 2003.

That’s about all I have to say, I apologize for a lack of original content, I just wanted to wish myself a Happy Veggiversary, and to any other members of the Green Mafia out there, keep on fighting the good fight…in a non-violent way of course…

Until next time,

G

It Ain’t Easy Being Green – Take 2 – The Environment

Wednesday, September 26th, 2007

How many of you intentionally throw your recyclables into the garbage?
How many of you leave your lights on all day and night?
How many of you drive an SUV?

Hopefully you all said no to those above questions. We are clearly in a difficult time when it comes to the environment. With rapidly rising temperatures and rapidly shrinking icecaps, there is simply no denying anymore that the world is getting warmer, and it would take a fool to think that it does not have something to do with the pollution we are producing.

This is why I hope that all of you have some concern for the environment and are making an effort to recycle, turn off your lights and choose fuel efficient methods of transportation. But what if I told you that what the vast majority of you are eating was doing worse things for our planet than any SUV or discarded pop can?

In a 2006 report, the UN concluded that livestock is doing more to accelerate global warming then all forms of transportation combined.

I’ll give you a minute to chew on that…It doesn’t matter if you decide to walk or drive a hybrid car to work, if you are eating a steak or drinking a glass of milk when you get home then you are completely undoing any of your environmental good will.

The report states:

When emissions from land use and land use change are included, the livestock sector accounts for 9 percent of CO2 deriving from human-related activities, but produces a much larger share of even more harmful greenhouse gases. It generates 65 percent of human-related nitrous oxide, which has 296 times the Global Warming Potential (GWP) of CO2. Most of this comes from manure.

And it accounts for respectively 37 percent of all human-induced methane (23 times as warming as CO2), which is largely produced by the digestive system of ruminants, and 64 percent of ammonia, which contributes significantly to acid rain.

“Livestock a Major Threat to Environment”, November, 29, 2006

In addition to being a huge contributor to Global Warming, there are many other important environmental hazards associated with the livestock industry, and the vast majority of them are directly related to the waste produced by the livestock themselves.

There is little to no regulation in the United States for the treatment and disposal of animal feces and urine, large amounts of it end up in our rivers and streams. This has been wrecking havoc on the fish population of the world. In the Gulf of Mexico, there is a “Dead Zone”, an area in which the vast majority of sea animals and plants have died. A 2006 study by Princeton concluded that run off from manure was a major contributor to this area, which is currently half the size of Maryland. Ohh and remember, if fish drink the contaminated water and you eat the contaminated fish (or eat something that has eaten that contaminated fish) then it will end up in your body, one way or another.

In places where there are regulations against polluting the water with animal manure, there is still a threat to people’s air. Many farmers spray liquid manure into the air, which in turn gets inhaled…charming thought, I know. The California State Senate recently did a study on the issue and stated: “Studies have shown that [animal waste] lagoons emit toxic airborne chemicals that can cause inflammatory, immune, irritation and neurochemical problems in humans.” If it is doing that to us, imagine what it is doing to the wildlife in the area or the environment all around us?

Additional polluters from the livestock industry come from the additional transportation and harvesting that needs to be done for the food of the livestock, but that will be the topic for the next edition of “It Ain’t Easy Being Green”, when I discuss wasted resources.

While I realize that you may not be directly harming the environment by eating meat, but every time you use your money to purchase some animal products you are financially supporting those who are damaging our environment. This makes you just as responsible.

So if you can’t afford a hybrid car anytime soon, I am sure that you can all afford to buy a salad instead of a steak. Mother nature will thank you.

Until next time,

G

Take 1 – Pacifism
Take 2 – The Environment
Take 3 – Pesticides, and Poo, and Pus, Oh My!
Take 4 – Distribution of Resources

It Ain’t Easy Being Green – Take 1 – Pacifism

Monday, September 17th, 2007

Anyone who knows me, knows that I am a practicing vegan. In the nearly three years that I have been “this way” I have had to defend my choices on a routine basis. I don’t know if it is because I have recently uprooted (yet again) and made a whole new peer group (yet again) or for other reasons, but I find myself defending my choices much more frequently in the past little while. As a result of this, I have decided that I will start a new feature here on my blogeroo (yet again), where I discuss some reasons why I am indeed a vegan. I realize that a few times before I have posted some news related articles about animal cruelty, but these posts will be less anecdotal and a bit more serious. Before I start, I would like to thank my good friend and long time hero, Kermit The Frog, for inspiring my title, God bless you frog, God bless you.

I guess I need to talk a bit about myself before I explain this reason. While I tend to act pretty off the wall sometimes, I consider myself to be a pretty mellow person at heart. While I am passionate about many things, I rarely ever get honestly or truly angry at anyone. As a result of this, I haven’t been in a fight since Grade 4. I find violence to be completely unnecessary in the vast majority of cases and I think that the more level headed approach is often the best one. I guess what I am trying to say here is, at the very core of my beliefs and value systems I consider myself to be a pacifist.

Editors Note: If I may, I would like to take a moment to meta-blog here. I have a feeling that any of you out there who eat meat (omnis as I call “you people”) are wondering when I will get to the point, but any of you out there who are vegans/vegetarians are realizing that I have already proven my point. Anyway, back to the point…

Violence is rarely about causing pain, it is rarely about proving a point, it is rarely about emotion, it is often about one thing, power. It is about taking the power from the victim and giving it to the perpetrator. It is a way of forcing your will upon another at the purest most basic of level. I have been a firm believer that might does not make right, and I hope many of you are as well.

What does this have to do with not consuming animal products you ask? Well, omnis out there, raise your hand if one of your main reasons for eating meat is because you like the taste…if 99.99999999999999% of you out there don’t have your hands up then you are either filthy liars or not playing along with my game, and what fun is that?

So if you eat meat because you like the taste, then you eat it because you want to. Your will is to eat the animal’s flesh. No matter how smart or dumb you think that an animal is, they all have the most basic desire when confronted with a potentially lethal situation “I am going to die, I don’t want to die”. When you kill that animal to eat it (or have someone else do it for you) you are clearly forcing your will upon that animal.

How can you justify violently forcing your will upon something? Is it ok because we have the canine teeth and technology? If so then that sounds like justifying something because you have the means and the power to do so. So does that mean then that might makes right?

It never has to me, and it never will.

I’m going to close with a video here called “Meet Your Meat”, which shows just how violently animals can be treated en route to your plate. I warn you, it contains some very graphic footage.

Until next time,

G

Take 1 – Pacifism
Take 2 – The Environment
Take 3 – Pesticides, and Poo, and Pus, Oh My!
Take 4 – Distribution of Resources

Yet Another Reason I’m a Vegan….

Thursday, May 31st, 2007

Hey there, I found this interesting little story about the country I was just in that I thought I would share.

Apparently the Chinese Government wants to end a 14 year ban on Tiger Farming. Various parts of the Tiger are used in traditional Chinese medicines. For example, if the bones are ground up sufficiently and drank in a tea they can offer a huge boost in energy. Also, the penis is said to have aphrodisiac properties. Of course, there is a huge market for the fur as well.

And of course, we all know the power of the Eye of the Tiger.

I have been looking for an excuse to include that one in here for a while…

All kidding aside, I find this absolutely repulsive.

One of China’s main arguments is that it would be easier to keep this endangered species alive in farms than trying to protect them in the wild. So logically, if we just farm them for all that they are worth and leave none in the wild, then we don’t have to worry about the environmental consequences of our actions.

If this works, how far away will we be from eating California condor eggs or black rhino steaks?

We really don’t have the right to dictate how another species should get to live, and it is reprehensible to think that a living, feeling, intelligent creature’s life should be at the whim of our traditions, fashion, or any other superficial whims.

I don’t have a ton of new stuff to add, you all know exactly how I feel on the issue. But I do have one question to ask, to anyone out there who finds the thought of farming tigers to be disgusting, cruel and unnecessary.

Why is it ok to do it to a cow, chicken or pig?

Until next time,

G

And you ask me why I’m vegan??

Thursday, February 8th, 2007

Today I found two little news stories that make me quite happy that I haven’t eaten an animal product in two and a half years.

The first of which was the news, that they discovered their 9th case of Mad Cow in Alberta since 2003. This has to really hurt for Canadian Cattle farmers, since this will of course get quite overplayed with the American Media and will no doubt hurt their trade. I do not wish any ills to the cattle farmers, who I believe are generally good, honest people. But you know what, I hope that Mad Cow cases like this really make people wonder about just what they are eating.

There is a new enhanced feed ban coming into place in July, which aims to eliminate cases of BSE (Mad Cow) within 10 years. Yes, 10 years. How does that make you omnis feel about eating potentially contaminated meat over the next decade?

People need to realize that when you eat an animal, you are eating everything that animal has eaten. Animal feed is often made up of some of the worst things. The Canadian Feed Policy states:

Canadian producers may feed their ruminants only approved animal protein (products) such as pure porcine, equine, poultry and fish products. Protein that includes meat and bone meal from mammals other than pigs and horses is prohibited in ruminant feeds. Milk, blood, gelatin, rendered animal fats and their products have not been banned.”

So that means for the next ten years that you are indirectly eating horse bones and blood. Sounds lovely doesn’t it?

One of my favourite sites, Vegan Porn (not as bad as it sounds), has a great on-line store, and this is a logo on one of their shirts. Hilarious eh?


I’m a medium if you are wondering.

Also in the news. Britain has called for an EU-wide ban on Seal products. This is mainly due to concerns over the annual Canadian Seal Hunt. Honestly one of the worst things ever. I can’t believe that our government allows, supports and sponsors this act of barbarism. I was googling some pictures to post on here and so many of them were gruesome and I didn’t want to put here, but here are some good before pictures.


Disgusting isn’t it?

Before I sign off, I have to ask. If clubbing a seal for fur is wrong then why is slitting a cow for leather right?

Until next time,

G